Naysayers+Page

The purpose of this page is to achnowledge what the other side is saying so at least the ideas of concern can be put on the table for discussion or debate. This is the first step in any negotiations. These include ideas that the naysayers believe to be true and they provide evidence for their case.

Below are files and links that present arguements against the human generated CO2 global warming, argue that the rise in CO2 is not going to be as harmful and may even be beneficial, or suggest that CO2 is only correlated with temperature and not a causal agent.

The House Energy subcommittee engaged in a "debate" about climate change (March 2011). Our Congress seems to be chock full of climate change naysayers. [] This is the 24th session of hearings on the topic.

From: Suzanne Powers, Grand Blanc High School, Grand Blanc, MI I have found a website with a ton of information as well as many links: Real Climate: [] Also Skeptical science: This is the link to a very recent (yesterday) response to congressional testimony about EPA emission standards...it discusses some of the common arguments presented at the committee meeting []. The home web page gives a list of arguements used by naysayers and then gives a rebuttal to each of these statements. Each statement in the list gives a reference to the source of information. See: [].

This web page shows a graph of temperature and carbon dioxide over geololic time and argue that we are in a cool cycle now and warming is expected and that CO2 can increase up to 10 times current levels and we are still in a liveable world. If the dinosaurs can live in high heat and high CO2 levels, so can we. See: [].

The Global Warming Petition Project argues against carbon dioxide being the causal factor of warming. they have a 12 page summary article of peer reviewed science papers and present counterarguements. See: []

The files below were captured off the Internet from a Google Search. You can click on the link to find the original source, which is followed by a link to a file on this space since I have found that URLs change or disappear over time.

FROM: [] 

FROM: [] 

FROM: []



<span style="font-family: "Courier New",Courier,monospace;">From: Tammy Keilman, Crown Point High For anyone who wants more info into the mechanics and men behind misrepresentation of science in the media (i.e. smoking isn't bad for you, acid raindoes not exist, climate change is doubted by most scientists, etc) then a must read is **Merchants of Doubt**. I read it last summer and it was outstanding. Over70 pages of citations to actual scientific and government documents, magazineop eds, etc. which support there are several men (two in particular), thinktanks, etc. that have made it their goal to discredit science in general. You will be outraged and astounded.